Overview:
more
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) oversees the US commercial aviation industry for the Department of Transportation. Since its beginning, FAA has had two main duties: promote the airline industry and ensure the safety of American passengers. The FAA has had mixed success carrying out its safety mission, including recent accounts of allowing one airline to fly planes not fully inspected by federal officials. Its tarnished reputation only got worst following the Sept. 11 hijackings of four commercial airliners.
History:
more
Federal regulation of the airline industry first began in the 1920s when the industry was still developing its wings. The Air Commerce Act of 1926 placed the US Commerce Department in charge of commercial air travel, leading to the creation of the Aeronautics Branch within the department. The Aeronautics Branch established the first safety standards for aircraft, as well as enforced air traffic rules, licensed pilots, certified aircraft and established airways.
In 1934, the Aeronautics Branch was renamed the Bureau of Air Commerce (BAC) to reflect its enhanced status within the Commerce Department. BAC encouraged a group of airlines to establish the first three air traffic control centers (ATCs). In 1936, the bureau took over the centers and began to expand the ATC system. The first air traffic controllers used maps, blackboards and mental calculations to ensure the safe separation of aircraft traveling along designated routes between cities.
The following year the nation experienced its first high-profile airline accident when a small TWA flight out of Los Angeles crashed in dense fog while trying to land in Kansas City, killing five of the nine people on board. One of the dead was a US Senator, Bronson Cutting (R-NH). The crash sparked Congressional hearings into airline safety, and three years later the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938 was passed. The legislation transferred federal civil aviation responsibilities from the Commerce Department to a new independent agency, the Civil Aeronautics Authority. The new body was given the power to regulate airline fares and determine the routes that air carriers would serve.
In 1940, President Franklin Roosevelt split the authority into two agencies, the Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA) and the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) and placed both within the Commerce Department. CAA was responsible for air traffic control centers, pilot and aircraft certification, safety enforcement and airway development. CAB was entrusted with safety rulemaking, accident investigation and economic regulation of the airlines.
Following World War II, the airline industry began to grow rapidly as more Americans embraced flying as a means to move around the country. With this increase in flights came an increase in safety incidents. During the first four months of 1956, 452 near misses were recorded. Two months later the nation was shocked by the news of a mid-air collision over the Grand Canyon involving a United Airlines plane and a TWA flight. All passengers and crew, 128 in total, died. The accident prompted Congress to approve funding for airports to install radar systems (many of them had none) and create a commission to study air traffic control systems. Two years later, another accident involving a commercial plane and an Air Force jet in Maryland led to new legislation creating the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) to provide better oversight of the industry while also helping it to grow.
In 1966, when Congress created the Department of Transportation, FAA was shifted into the new cabinet department and became known as the Federal Aviation Administration. The reconstituted FAA lost control of airline accident investigations which was given to the newly formed National Transportation Safety Board. FAA didn’t lack for work as it gained a new responsibility following a rash of airline hijackings in the 1960s. By the early 1970s, FAA was required to make sure all airports implemented security screening checkpoints to keep terrorists off US airlines. FAA did not, however, create a uniform standard for safety, leaving it to individual airports to decide what constituted “safe.”
The 1970s gave witness to several key developments and accidents involving commercial airlines. In 1977, the worst accident in commercial aviation history occurred inthe Canary Islands off of the northwest coast of Africa when two Boeing 747s collided, killing 583 of 644 people on board both aircraft. The following year, Congress decided to deregulate the airline industry, which meant the FAA was no longer responsible for setting price controls for flights. Consumer advocates and safety experts expressed concerns over how deregulation might impact airline safety. That same year, a PSA 727 collided in midair with a small plane over San Diego. The incident produced a dramatic photo taken from the ground of the PSA jet hurtling towards the earth after the collision. All 135 people aboard the airliner, both pilots of the Cessna, and seven people on the ground were killed in what is still today the worst aviation disaster in California history.
In 1979, an American Airlines DC-10 crashed on takeoff from O'Hare International Airport after catastrophic mechanical failure. All 271 people on board and two on the ground were killed. To date, the accident is the worst non-terrorist-related airliner incident to occur on American soil.
Meanwhile, new advances in computer technology and radar allowed the FAA to create a new air traffic control system that relied less on human participation to keep track of and route flights. By then air traffic controllers had unionized and begun to demand higher wages and benefits. A period of discord between airline management and the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (PATCO), the union representing air traffic controllers, culminated in a 1970 “sickout” by 3,000 controllers. Air traffic controllers were prevented from going on strike under federal law, but this restriction did not prevent PATCO members from walking out in August 1981. President Ronald Reagan, in an act viewed by labor as favoring the airline industry, ordered the firing of more than 11,000 striking air traffic controllers and decertified PATCO.
The firing of the air traffic controllers produced considerable worry among consumer advocates and airline safety experts over the state of commercial flight safety. As it turned out, the 1980s featured several dramatic airline accidents, although none of them were related to faulty performance by air traffic control operators. In 1985, a Delta Air Lines airliner crashed on approach to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport due to wind shear from a sudden microburst thunderstorm. Of the 163 passengers and crew aboard, only 29 survived. Three years later, one of the most famous terrorist-related airline accidents occurred when Pan Am Flight 103, a Boeing 747, disintegrated in the air over Lockerbie, Scotland, after a terrorist bomb exploded on board. All 259 people on board and 11 on the ground were killed. Libya’s dictator, Muammar al-Qaddafi, was accused of being behind the attack.
The following year, 1989, a McDonnell Douglas DC-10 exploded in mid-air over the Sahara desert when a bomb hidden in its forward cargo hold detonated. All 170 people on board were killed. Responsibility for the bombing was later traced back to Abdullah Sanussi, Qaddafi’s brother-in-law. That same year, a United Airlines DC-10 suffered a complete hydraulic system failure over Iowa after the tail-mounted engine disintegrated. The crew managed to bring the aircraft into a crash landing at the Sioux City, Iowa, airport. Of the 296 people on board, 111 die.
In response to the Lockerbie incident, the administration of President George H.W. Bush conducted a review of airline security in the US. FAA’s record of protecting American passengers was ridiculed by some members of Congress, citing the recent rash of accidents stemming from either mechanical failures or terrorism. The Government Accountability Office issued a report in 1990 urging FAA to improve its efforts in four key areas: passenger screening, airport security controls, security inspections and training for security personnel. That same year, President Bush’s own panel of experts blasted FAA for contributing to the Lockerbie incident by not enforcing its own safety regulations. Legislation was adopted, the Aviation Security Improvement Act of 1990, that mandated changes in the way FAA carried out its mission. Some critics said the move did little more than expand FAA’s bloated bureaucracy.
FAA’s responsibility for inspecting airline maintenance work was called into question in the mid 1990s. In 1994, a USAir flight crashed while attempting to land at Pittsburgh, killing all 133 people on board. Investigations showed that a fault in the Boeing 737 rudder was to blame for the crash. During this same time period, a no-frills airline, ValuJet, was increasingly coming under attack by the FAA’s own Inspector General for numerous safety and maintenance incidents. FAA officials ignored reports by the IG of the dangerous manner in which ValuJet officials were running their company. Finally, in 1996, FAA leadership as well as other federal officials couldn’t help but take notice of ValuJet when one of its planes, Flight 592, crashed in the Everglades near Miami due to a fire in its cargo hold. All 110 people on board were killed. The cause of the crash was blamed on oxygen generators that had been improperly stowed in the cargo hold of the plane, causing a fire that swept through the passenger cabin. ValuJet subsequently went out of business following a lengthy investigation and numerous lawsuits.
As if that wasn’t bad enough, another terrible airline accident occurred a few months after the ValuJet crash. In July 1996, TWA Flight 800, a Boeing 747, exploded in mid-air above the ocean off East Moriches, New York, killing all 230 people on board. The FBI investigated the crash along with the National Transportation Safety Board due to suspicions that the plane had been shot down by a missile fired by terrorists. Conspiracy theories blamed the downing on a missile fired by the US Navy. FAA officials blamed the crash on faulty wiring that ignited a fuel tank in one of the aircraft’s wings, although investigations could not conclusively say this was the reason. Although terrorism was not blamed for the accident, an investigation led by Vice President Al Gore found the FAA’s bag checking procedures to be insufficient to properly secure future flights from bomb attacks.
Five years later, there was no doubt about the cause of the worst series of aviation crashes in US history. On Sept. 11, 2001, four American commercial airliners were hijacked by terrorists and rerouted to New York City and Washington, DC. American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767 with 92 people on board, was flown into the north tower of the World Trade Center, killing everyone on board and numerous others in the building. Another United Airlines 767 plane, Flight 175, with 65 people on board, crashed into the south tower, killing all on board and many more on the ground and in the building. The collapse of both towers brought the total death toll from the two crashes to at least 2,759 including the hijackers and 343 firefighters.
In Washington, DC, American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757 with 64 people on board, was crashed into the Pentagon, killing all on board as well as 125 people in the building. The last hijacked flight, United Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing 757 with 44 people on board, crashed into a field in rural Pennsylvania after passengers struggled with the hijackers for control of the plane. Only two months later, another American Airlines plane crashed into a neighborhood in New York City, killing 265 people. Officials immediately suspected terrorism was to blame, but subsequent investigations placed the fault of the crash on the plane’s vertical tail fin, which snapped just after takeoff.
In the wake of the 9/11 hijackings, federal officials decided it was time for a dramatic change in airline security procedures. Instead of allowing airlines and airports contracts with private companies to provide screeners, Congress federalized airport security operations and created the Transportation Safety Administration to run the operations. Not only was airport screening taken away from FAA, but so was control of the federal Air Marshals program, which was revamped and given to TSA. These changes were seen as an indictment of the FAA’s inability to properly protect Americans and commercial flights from terrorists.
U.S. Aviation Security: Before and after the September 11 Terrorist Attacks
(by E. Marla Felcher, Understanding Government)
What it Does:
more
Part of the Department of Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates the commercial aviation industry in the US. Since its beginning, FAA has had two main duties: promote the airline industry and ensure the safety of American passengers. The FAA has had mixed success carrying out its safety mission.
As the primary oversight agency for airlines, FAA maintains voluminous records of regulations and standards that companies like United Airlines, Delta, Southwest and others must follow in order to transport passengers. FAA also sets rules for airport operations and pilots. The nations’ air traffic control system, which directs commercial, private and military aircraft all across the US, is also the responsibility of the FAA, which employs all traffic controllers.
FAA continues to be responsible for issuing federal regulations that govern the activity of the commercial aviation industry. Among the thousands of documents and rules FAA produces and maintains are standards that apply to Air Carriers & Operators and Pilots, Flight & Ground Instructors. FAA also issues advisories and guidance for how airports should be run as well as rulebooks and manuals that explain required procedures for aircraft, aviation and examiners & inspectors.
FAA is responsible for certifying that all commercial aviation aircraft, pilots, companies and airports meet the prescribed standards set forth by federal regulations. Extensive details are made available on Aircraft Certification (approved designs, airworthiness, operational safety), Airline Certification, Airmen Certification, Airport Certification, and Commercial Space Certification (private ventures into space, such as satellites).
FAA employs 35,000 air traffic controllers, technicians, engineers and support personnel whose jobs are to manage and direct all commercial, private and military aviation around the United States. FAA’s Air Traffic Organization (ATO) is charged with this responsibility. ATO has nine service units that handle the following: Acquisition and Business Services; Communications; En Route and Oceanic Services; Finance; Operations Planning; Safety; System Operations Services; Technical Operations Services; and Terminal Services. ATO also publishes information about the Air Traffic Controller Workforce Plan and Air Traffic Publications.
Another area of responsibility is the Airport Improvement Plan, in which FAA provides grants to public agencies, private owners and entities for the planning and development of public-use airports. FAA provides a large volume of information about construction on or near airports for local operators. Details are available on Acquiring Land for Airports and Relocation Assistance; Airport Lighting; Construction Standards; Design Software; Design Standards; Obstruction Evaluation/Airport Airspace Analysis; Opening or Closing an Airport; Pavement Design and Construction; and Procurement and Contracting under AIP. Even more information is provided under the airport construction section.
If individuals have safety issues they wish to notify the FAA about, a hotline (800-255-1111) exists to call and file reports. The safety section also produces safety advisories and alerts, safety programs involving pilots, runways and airports and details about hazardous materials.
Virtually every kind of fact and statistic related to airline operations, airports and other aspects of the commercial aviation industry can be found through this section of the FAA. There are Accident & Incident Reports (Preliminary Data and Final Data); Airline On-Time Statistics & Delay Causes; Airmen Knowledge Test Statistics; Commercial Space Data (Upcoming & Recent Launch Data and Historical Launch Data); Unruly Passengers Statistics; Passenger Boarding and All-Cargo Data; and Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS).
The Environmental Program assists airports with the implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other federal environmental laws and regulations. This includes airport noise compatibility planning, airport noise and access restrictions, environmental review for airport development, and the application of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. The environmental section covers areas such as the Air Quality Handbook, the Advisory Circular 34-1B (PDF) regarding Fuel Venting and Exhaust Emission Requirements for Turbine Engine Powered Planes, Aircraft Noise Issues, Airport Environmental Program, Environmental Records of Decision and the Voluntary Airport Low Emissions (VALE) Program.
FAA’s technology division covers all areas of hardware, software and infrastructure that pertain to airport operations. This includes
Advanced Technologies & Oceanic Procedures
;
Airport Surface Detection Equipment
;
;
Federal Telecommunications Infrastructure
;
Integrated Terminal Weather System
; and
Terminal Automation and Replacement
.
Where Does the Money Go:
more
From 2000-2008 the FAA dolled out $2.4 billion to 2,175 contractors, according to USASpending.gov. The largest expenditures went for engineering services, building of air traffic control towers and costs related to radar equipment. Led by defense giant Northrop Grumman, the top 10 recipients of FAA contracts were:
|
Northrop Grumman Corporation
|
$185,511,112
|
|
Computer Sciences Corporation
|
$106,314,938
|
|
Sensis Corporation
|
$86,308,798
|
|
TTS Joint Venture
|
$74,229,683
|
|
Management & Engineering Tech Intl.
|
$68,040,442
|
|
Apptis (De), Inc.
|
$65,787,928
|
|
Arinc Incorporated
|
$65,097,614
|
|
The Washington Consulting Group, Inc.
|
$64,733,000
|
|
Torcon, Inc.
|
$63,244,089
|
|
Flint Resources Company, LLC
|
$52,250,045
|
Examples of FAA contractors and their contracts include ASRC Management Services which was given a $215 million contract to work on the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City, OK for up to five years. The company will provide engineering support services to the FAA.
Computer Sciences Corporation, which has spent almost three decades working for FAA, was awarded a $68 million contract to design, develop and test components of the FAA’s future Controller Pilot Data Communications Link system.
Another longtime contractor, BAE Systems, was given two contracts totaling $107 million by the FAA. BAE Systems, which has done work for the agency for 10 years, received a $67 million contract to provide systems engineering and support services and a $40 million contract to provide management and financial support services.
Tetra Tech Inc. received its largest FAA contract to date when it was awarded a $60 million deal to support FAA’s Global Positioning System. Tetra Tech will provide technical engineering and business support services to help manage the agency’s satellite navigation system. The deal followed on the heels of another FAA contract worth $52 million to provide IT support to the Office of Security and Hazardous Materials.
Harris Corporation received a $5.7 million contract extension to the Weather and Radar Processor program, bringing the company’s total to $131 million it has received from the FAA since 1996. WARP is a next-generation weather and radar system that allows FAA officials to consolidate weather data from several sources into a single, integrated display to support air traffic operations nationwide.
Computer manufacturer Lexmark sold the FAA $60 million in laser printers and other computer equipment for the agency’s 800 offices.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) National Airspace System (NAS) Awards Engineering Support... (Business Wire)
Tetra Tech Wins Federal Aviation Administration Satellite Navigation Assistance Contract (Space Daily)
(Business Wire)
Controversies:
more
FAA Destroyed 9/11 Tapes
Following the hijackings and crashings of US airliners on Sept. 11, 2001, the federal government appointed a special panel to conduct a far-reaching investigation into how the attacks were allowed to occur. In the course of its investigation, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States complained that the FAA had been “less than forthcoming” when it came to turning over documents, forcing the commission to issue a subpoena to gather more information.
What the commission found out while interviewing numerous FAA officials was that on the day of the attacks, an FAA manager at the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center recorded interviews with six controllers who helped track or communicate with the hijacked planes. The manager reportedly wanted to record the accounts while the details of the event were still fresh in the minds of the controllers.
But the commission was unable to find out what had been recorded because a second FAA manager destroyed the tape. According to a report by the Department of Transportation’s Inspector General (IG), the second manager promised a union official representing the controllers that he would “get rid of” the tape after controllers used it to provide written statements to federal officials about the hijackings. The second manager said he destroyed the tape between December 2001 and January 2002 by crushing the tape with his hand, cutting it into small pieces and depositing the pieces into trash cans around the building.
Following the attacks, the FAA sent out an email to employees informing them to retain all information regarding the 9/11 events. After learning of the tape being destroyed, FAA officials offered conflicting accounts as to whether the second manager would be disciplined for his actions. FAA officials also said that they believed the tape would not have yielded any additional information from written accounts provided by the air traffic controllers who were interviewed.
The IG was not happy with the actions of the FAA manager in New York. In its report, the IG office wrote, “The destruction of evidence in the Government's possession, in this case an audiotape -- particularly during times of national crisis -- has the effect of fostering an appearance that information is being withheld from the public.”
FAA Managers Destroyed 9/11 Tape: Recording Contained Accounts of Communications With Hijacked Planes (by Sara Kehaulani Goo, Washington Post)
Lack of Oversight of Southwest Airlines
In April 2008 Congressional hearings revealed that the FAA’s safety operations in Texas had allowed Southwest Airlines to conduct numerous flights over several years without being fully inspected. The failure by FAA to carry out the inspections was revealed by agency whistle-blowers, one of whom lost his job before the FAA was forced to reinstate him.
As a result of the oversight lapse, two FAA managers were disciplined. One was the regional safety inspection manager based in Texas, who covered Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico and Oklahoma flights by Southwest.
Southwest Airlines faced a $10 million fine for flying more than three dozen planes without first having FAA inspectors conduct thorough reviews of the planes’ internal controls.
FAA removes senior regulator in Texas after Southwest Airlines controversy (by Dave Michaels, Dallas Morning News)
Whistleblowers Front and Center at Tomorrow’s FAA Hearing (Project on Government Oversight)
United Airlines grounds 777s for inspections, cancels 31 flights, warns of possible delays (Associated Press)
Overworked Air Traffic Controllers
FAA: Air Traffic Controller Crisis (YouTube)
Sen. Boxer Takes on FAA Sturgell (YouTube)
Basis Towards Airlines
(by James Hohmann, Los Angeles Times)
- Table of Contents
- Overview
- History
- What it Does
- Where Does the Money Go
- Controversies
- Suggested Reforms
- Comments
- Leave a comment
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Comments