Mother Loses Baby in Mississippi Because She Doesn’t Speak English

Wednesday, September 02, 2009
Chatno children (photo: davidlaura.org)

Not knowing English apparently disqualifies a woman from being a good mother, according to some health officials in Mississippi. Cirila Baltazar Cruz is a 34-year-old illegal immigrant and restaurant worker from Mexico who speaks neither English nor Spanish…only Chatino, a language spoken by less than 23,000 people in the southern part of the Mexican state of Oaxaca, After flagging down a police car, she gave birth to a baby girl, Rubi, at Singing River Hospital in Pascagoula, and then, two days later, had the child taken from her by the Mississippi Department of Human Services. Officials ruled that Baltazar was unfit to care for Rubi in part because her lack of English “placed her unborn child in danger and will place the baby in danger in the future.”

 
Baltazar now faces the possibility of being deported without her daughter. She is fighting in court to regain custody of Rubi with the help of the Mississippi Immigrants’ Rights Alliance and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Mary Bauer, SPLC’s legal director, called the decision to take away Baltazar’s child on grounds of her non-English skills a “fundamentally outrageous violation of human rights.” A spokesman for the hospital, Richard Lucas, called the charge “preposterous” and reiterated that hospital authorities were correct in contacting the state Department of Human Services.
-Noel Brinkerhoff, David Wallechinsky
 
Can a Mother Lose Her Child Because She Doesn't Speak English? (by Tim Padgett with Dolly Mascareñas/Oaxaca, Time)
Interview with Cirila Baltazar (audio in Chatino and Spanish) (Archivos radio bilingüe)

Comments

L. James 15 years ago
RE: The comments of Jose Guaerra There is a huge difference between leaving 2 children in the care of grandparents in order to search for work in the U.S. and abandonment. I'm not sure where the allegation that she was planning to abandon her third child comes from; if this were the case then it makes absolutely no sense for her to engage in a protracted court battle to get the child back. No one should lose a child because of the language they speak, or simply because they are poor. Period.
Jose Guaerra 15 years ago
There's almost no truth in the above article. The language barrier made the legal proceedings more difficult but had nothing to do with the ruling. The mother abandoned 2 previous children in Mexico and she was planning to sell or abandon the new baby. Once confronted she made no effort to work with DHS to be reunited with the baby. She's been in the USA illegally for 7 years and can't speak english and barely can speak spanish. She has no permanent home and no permanent job and no relatives with jobs or homes. How can DHS turn an infant over to someone so unstable?

Leave a comment