Kentucky Supreme Court Rules “Biblical Health Care” is a Form of Insurance
Monday, September 13, 2010
Medi-Share, operated by the American Evangelistic Association and the Christian Care Ministry, can be considered a type of insurance despite its characterization of offering “affordable, biblical health care” to customers, all of whom must be Christian, ruled the Kentucky Supreme Court by a 5-2 vote.
Members of Medi-Share must commit to a Christian lifestyle, attend church and avoid practices such as smoking, taking illegal drugs and excessive drinking. But the plan does not operate like a conventional insurance company, as members pay each others’ medical bills. In this sense, it is more like a religious cooperative. Each month, members are also assigned a fellow member to pray for.
Medi-Share is not licensed to sell insurance and currently is not regulated by the state of Kentucky. However, the majority opinion pointed out that Medi-Share’s advertising calls itself an “alternative to expensive health insurance” and “member testimonials tout the monetary amount of their medical bills which were paid through Medi-Share and make claims
such as ‘the medical bills would have destroyed us financially, except for Medi-
Share.’”
The court case began when the state sued Medi-Share for the unauthorized sale of insurance. Lower courts ruled that Medi-Share was not insurance, but the state Supreme Court reversed those decisions.
-Noel Brinkerhoff, David Wallechinsky
'Biblical Health Care' Is Insurance, Court Rules (by Jeff Gorman, Courthouse News Service)
Kentucky v. E. John Reinhold (Kentucky Supreme Court) (pdf)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- Controversies
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Trump Announces He Will Switch Support from Russia to Ukraine
- Americans are Unhappy with the Direction of the Country…What’s New?
- Can Biden Murder Trump and Get Away With it?
- Electoral Advice for the Democratic and Republican Parties
- U.S. Ambassador to Greece: Who is George Tsunis?
Comments