Federal Court Rules Details of Secret Prison in Afghanistan Can Remain Secret
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Bagram Air Base
Details about the United States’ largest prison in Afghanistan will remain secret, according to a federal judge’s ruling this week. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) had sought documents from the Department of Defense and the CIA about those held at Bagram Air Base, including information regarding citizenship, length of imprisonment, country where they were captured and circumstances of their capture.
The only key information released by the Pentagon was a list of 645 names of those detained at Bagram as of September 2009.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York not only denied the ACLU’s motion to order the government to release the information sought, but also ruled that the CIA did not act improperly when it refused to even confirm or deny the existence of CIA records about the rendition and interrogation of Bagram detainees.
Although the Obama administration has said it would turn over most of the Bagram prison to the Afghan government next year, it will apparently continue to control part of the prison and its own detainees, including non-Afghan citizens captured outside of Afghanistan.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
Federal Court Rules Government Can Keep Secret Basic Facts about Bagram Prisoners (American Civil Liberties Union)
Bagram FOIA (American Civil Liberties Union)
Special Ops/DIA Prison in Afghanistan Denies Red Cross Access to Detainees (by Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky, AllGov)
Red Cross Confirms Secret U.S. Prison in Afghanistan (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- Controversies
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Bashar al-Assad—The Fall of a Rabid AntiSemite
- Trump Announces He Will Switch Support from Russia to Ukraine
- Americans are Unhappy with the Direction of the Country…What’s New?
- Can Biden Murder Trump and Get Away With it?
- Electoral Advice for the Democratic and Republican Parties
Comments