Who Should Decide if a Property is “Historic”?

Monday, June 08, 2009

Montgomery County, Maryland, is the site of a fierce debate over whether a local government has the right to designate private property as “historic” against the will of the owner. The property in question is owned by Sherwood Duvall, 90, who has owned the same farm since the 1930s, and wants to tear down several old buildings. But country commissioners believe the buildings should be preserved and are trying to declare Duvall’s farm a historic landmark, arguing the structures are architecturally significant. Duvall has countered that there is nothing historical about the buildings—they’re “just old”—and that keeping them requires repairs and maintenance costing thousands of dollars per year. He also wants to build a new home for his grandson in place of one of the two-story farmhouses currently on his property.

 
Historical preservation is big in Montgomery County, which has designated 400 sites and 21 neighborhoods with special status. But the efforts, including that targeting Duvall’s property, have produced a backlash, and the County Council is now considering legislation that would make it more difficult to declare a site as historic when the property owner objects. A collection of local, state and national preservationists are trying to defeat the legislation, sending in emails, petitions and testimony claiming the new law could result in important old structures or locations being bulldozed.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Standing Their Ground (by Ann E. Marimow, Washington Post)

Comments

Leave a comment