Death #7 at Guantánamo

Sunday, February 06, 2011
(photo: A. Pessin VOA)
Awal Gul, 48, of Afghanistan, has become the seventh detainee to die at Guantánamo Bay since the U.S. began imprisoning foreign nationals at the military base in January 2002.
 
Gul was held for nine years without being charged or tried for any crime. He reportedly died of a heart attack, though conflicting accounts made it unclear if his death occurred in an exercise yard or in the showers.
 
The Afghan ran a weapons depot in his home town in eastern Afghanistan, and did business with the Taliban after it took over the government in 1996. But during the U.S.-supported attacks in 2001 that sought the overthrow of the Taliban, Gul claimed to have sided with a pro-American warlord, Hazrat Ali. On Ali’s advice, he turned himself in to Northern Alliance commanders in order to demonstrate that he was no longer involved with the Taliban. Nevertheless, he was handed over to the U.S. authorities and shipped to Guantánamo.
 
“Awal Gul’s death illustrates too well what Guantánamo has become—a prison where Muslim men are held indefinitely until they die because the president lacks political courage to release or charge them in any forum,” said the Center for Constitutional Rights in a prepared statement.
 
Three of the previous six deaths at Guantánamo were highly controversial. On June 10, 2006, three Saudi prisoners were found hanging in their separate cells—hands and feet tied and with gags in their mouths. The U.S. military ruled the deaths a group suicide protest. Two of the other deaths were also ruled suicides, while one prisoner, Abdul Razzaq Hekmati, died of cancer on December 30, 2007. Hekmati was known as an anti-Taliban activist, but ended up in U.S. custody anyway.
-Noel Brinkerhoff, David Wallechinsky
 
The Mysterious Deaths of 3 Guantánamo Prisoners (by David Wallechinsky and Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)

Comments

mawendt 13 years ago
ah, a month late in response... actually, Ricky, as an army intelligence analyst ending a 13 month tour in the 'stan i do know what what i'm talking about. funny thing, i've had to deal with this class of guys in passing, more than a few times. and how do you have any special insight on whats going on at gitmo? i'm thinking one of us seems to have more knowlege and access to ground truth that the other. i'll tell you this: for every more than a couple thousand guys picked up doing something (or suspected of doing something) naughty, only one gets invited to vacation at gitmo. that in itself dispels the wanton, random detention of innocents. the military is pretty choosy on who they detain - you got to earn it. as far as being a disgrace, that is an unsubstantiated opinion. the disgrace would be 'not-gitmo' alternatives - the geneva guidance on handling illegal combatants allows summary executions (something the US elects not to employ), and does allow indefinite detention until hostilities end. so rather than do the un-humanitarian thing, we detain a bad guy a few years and his connections, associations, and trust commitments deteriorate. plus, after a while of being separated from their family and anti-american support, the bad guys sometimes give up, and often talk. which is why we have gitmo rather than the gallows. enjoyed your response. Rick. a day that goes by without me annoying a liberal is a day wasted.
mawendt 14 years ago
show me where, in warfare, in law, or under the geneva and hauge conventions, that a military authority is obligated to provide due process to unlawful combatants. and to compare those detained for anti-US/coalition activity to only Beck or Palin certainly identifies your policical pursuasion. you could have just as easily, more easily, mentioned shultz or olberman or pelosi. everyone at gitmo earned their stay there. i know its difficult when YOU don't get to know how they earned it, however, they are either the baddest of the baddies, or have some information or association that is influenced by their detention. and speaking of detention - i easily see the hypocrisy of the liberal on this issue. during the subsequent administration, there was a daily slapping and demeaning of pres bush. yet, now that president obama is in charge? crickets. be happy. Awal Gul finally got released.
Richard 14 years ago
Maybe you should just shut the fuck up about stuff you don't know anything about. You've never set foot in Guantanamo, let alone had to deal with these guys, so how do you know anything about what's going on down here? Oh that's right you don't.
sforsyth 14 years ago
oh for heaven's sake; it is never a question of whether they are "good" or "nice people". If we locked up every not good or not nice person in the U.S., Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin would be imprisoned indefintiely. It is a question of: would you want to be held without any kind hearing whatsoever for year after year after year with no chance of due process? Gitmo is a deep disgrace, as deep as the Japanese concentration camps we ran, but worse because there is no predefined end in sight.
Michael 14 years ago
Who cares its a good place to keep them all until they die. Don't believe the BS that these are good people. I have been toe to toe with some of these guys. They are not nice people.

Leave a comment