Many of Largest U.S. Corporations Paid More for Lobbying than for Federal Income Taxes
Friday, January 27, 2012
GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt and Barack Obama (AP Photo)
The federal government is responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars being spent each year by the largest American corporations. But it’s not tax dollars they’re spending. Rather, this sum represents the amount big business is allocating on lobbying lawmakers and federal officials, in part so the companies wind up paying considerably less on income taxes than they do on influencing public policy.
According to a new report from the nonprofit Public Campaign, 30 of the biggest corporations spent more lobbying Congress than paying taxes from 2008 to 2010. These businesses made combined profits of $164 billion during the period analyzed. But they ended up enjoying tax rebates that collectively totaled nearly $11 billion.
Meanwhile, the 30 companies spent $476 million on lobbying and contributed more than $22 million to federal election campaigns.
The corporations included General Electric, PG&E, Verizon, Wells Fargo, Boeing, DuPont, Mattel, Corning and FedEx. General Electric made $10.5 billion in U.S. profits and spent more than $84 million on lobbying, but paid no federal income taxes.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
For Hire: Lobbyists or the 99%? (Public Campaign of, by, and for the People) (pdf)
General Electric Doesn’t Pay Taxes; Why Should You? (by Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky, AllGov)
Why Did Obama Choose Outsourcing Champion Jeffrey Immelt as Jobs Advisor? (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
Corporations Have Easy Time Beating Tax Code (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- Controversies
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- The 2024 Election By the Numbers
- Bashar al-Assad—The Fall of a Rabid AntiSemite
- Trump Announces He Will Switch Support from Russia to Ukraine
- Americans are Unhappy with the Direction of the Country…What’s New?
- Can Biden Murder Trump and Get Away With it?
Comments