Divorcee Keeps Alimony by Rebranding New Wedding as “Commitment” Ceremony

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Andrea Left has a new “husband” but is still collecting alimony from her old one after convincing two California courts that she never really remarried.

 

When the Lefts divorced in 2008, stock trader Andrew Left agreed to pay his ex-wife $32,547 a month in alimony, plus $14,590 in monthly child support.

 

Andrea, a former entertainment lawyer, then met physician Todd Katzman, whom she agreed to marry. The two registered for gifts at Bloomingdale’s and participated in a ceremony in Palm Springs on May 2, 2009, after which Andrea told her children she considered herself married to Katzman. She and Katzman even signed a Jewish marriage contract known as a ketubah.

 

Andrew figured he was no longer obligated to pay alimony and stopped making monthly payments. His former wife, however, challenged him in court, contending that she had merely participated in a “commitment ceremony” with Katzman and was not his wife.

 

Both the Los Angeles County Superior Court and Second District California Court of Appeals agreed with Andrea, leaving Andrew still on the hook for paying alimony.

-Noel Brinkerhoff

 

To Learn More:

Prominent Investor Gets ‘Screwed’ By Ex-Wife’s Lawyering Skills (by Staci Zaretsky, Above the Law)

Commitment Ceremony Won't Stop Ex's Checks (by Jeff Gorman, Courthouse News Service)

Andrea Nicole Left v. Andrew Edward Left (California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two) (pdf)

Comments

NoMoreMarxistsInGovernment 12 years ago
Judicial immunity doesn't protect "judicial independence". It creates "judicial corruption and tyranny", as shown in this case. If no marriage license was issued, it's a scam "marriage" constituting fraud to circumvent a legal situation. The ex-husband needs to sue to have the "commitment" overturned as fraud, deception and an illegal conversion of property.
Dadzrites 12 years ago
Judges (especially these California appellate judges) are nothing more than corrupt sexual perverts in black dresses. The whole Idea that a "marriage" is not a "marriage" is a fraud and deception and needs to be overturned. These appellate judges need to be taken off the bench with extreme prejudice, and their pensions revoked. This is why we need to eliminate the novel and fraudulent doctrine of "judicial immunity" by legislating it out of existence by laws and
NoMoreMarxistsInGovernment 12 years ago
Only in California is fraud, deception, corruption, extortion and criminal behavior acceptable. And does anyone wonder why lawyers and judges are hated and despised so much, and why the courts are distrusted so immensely--especially the family/domestic relations courts as being nothing more than a corrupt government entity? What a crock.

Leave a comment