Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Re-Copyrighting Public Domain Works
Friday, January 20, 2012
Over the objections of musicians, teachers and others, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided that some creative works that have entered the public domain can return to copyright status.
In a 6-2 ruling, the court said that Congress can authorize the re-copyrighting of books, musical compositions and other works. The case applied to a 1994 law that affected public works first published overseas between 1923 and 1989.
A group of orchestra conductors, educators, performers, publishers and film archivists brought the case to the high court after losing a decision before an appellate court. The plaintiffs argued that re-copyrighting public works would breach the speech rights of those who are now using those works without needing a license.
The decision has the potential to impact millions of old works, including books by H.G. Wells, Fritz Lang’s film Metropolis, the British films of Alfred Hitchcock and the musical compositions of Igor Stravinsky and Sergei Prokofiev.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works (by David Kravets, Wired)
Public Domain Works Can Be Copyrighted Anew, Supreme Court Rules (by Adam Liptak, New York Times)
Golan v. Holder (U.S. Supreme Court) (pdf)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- Controversies
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Bashar al-Assad—The Fall of a Rabid AntiSemite
- Trump Announces He Will Switch Support from Russia to Ukraine
- Americans are Unhappy with the Direction of the Country…What’s New?
- Can Biden Murder Trump and Get Away With it?
- Electoral Advice for the Democratic and Republican Parties
Comments