How Dell and Others Gave Tax Break Savings to Shareholders Instead of Creating Jobs

Sunday, June 07, 2009

Five years ago the federal government gave American corporations a one-time tax holiday on profits made overseas so that they would invest the savings in the U.S. operations and create new jobs. A new study has found, however, that few companies used the 2004 Homeland Investment Act the way Congress intended, and instead gave most of the tax break to shareholders.

 
According to the report (Watch What I Do, Not What I Say: The Unintended Consequences of the Homeland Investment Act) by the National Bureau of Economic Research, corporations brought home $300 billion in overseas profits in 2005, paying a tax rate of only 5.25% on the earnings instead of the usual 35%. Researchers calculated that 92% of this money was essentially given to shareholders through share buybacks and increased dividends.
 
For instance, Dell Computer—one of the biggest proponents of the Homeland Investment Act—brought home $4 billion in profits from its international operations and spent half of it on share buybacks. Dell did spend $100 million on a new plant in Winston-Salem, NC, but researchers say the company would have built it regardless of whether or not Congress had passed the act.
 
While researchers concluded the 2004 legislation did not spur the domestic investment lawmakers wanted, the tax holiday may have benefited the U.S. economy in other ways. “The tax holiday encouraged U.S. multinationals to repatriate roughly $300 billion of foreign earnings and pay most of these earnings to shareholders,” wrote the authors of the report. “Presumably these shareholders either reinvested these funds or used them for consumption. Either of these activities could have an effect on U.S. growth, investment and employment.”
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Tax Break for Profits Went Awry (by Floyd Norris, New York Times)

Comments

John 15 years ago
Makes sense to me. Companies don't hire people just because they have cash laying around. Companies make a decision to hire based on current or near future business that they can make more money by hiring an employee. They make the calculation that if they spend some money on salary and benefits they will earn more than that amount in expanded sales. Notice that excess cash on hand doesn't enter into the calculation. All this talk about giving money to corporations and the rich so that they will "create jobs" is simply nonsense, political hot air. Businesses add head count when they need them. To create jobs create demand in the market place.

Leave a comment