Nuclear Power Subsidies Would Shift Risks from Industry to Taxpayers
Wednesday, August 04, 2010

Having been bailed out twice before, and subsidized only five years ago, the nuclear power industry is seeking even more federal assistance from taxpayers, who would be on the hook if expensive, new reactors don’t pan out.
Under the proposed subsidy plan, the industry could receive up to $40 billion if it builds eight new reactors over a 15-year period. But if companies complete all 31 reactors the industry wants, they would be in line to get between $65 billion and $147 billion from the federal government.
The Union of Concerned Scientists argues against this attempt to “shift massive construction, financing, operating and regulatory costs and risks from the industry and its financial backers to U.S. taxpayers.”
The group adds: “Congress should reject these overly generous subsidies to this mature industry whose history of skyrocketing costs and construction overruns already has resulted in two costly bailouts by taxpayers and captive ratepayers—once in the 1970s and 1980s when utilities cancelled or abandoned more than 100 plants, and again in the 1990s when plant owners offloaded their ‘stranded costs.’”
-Noel Brinkerhoff
Billions of Dollars in Subsidies for the Nuclear Power Industry Will Shift Financial Risks to Taxpayers (Union of Concerned Scientists) (pdf)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- Controversies
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Musk and Trump Fire Members of Congress
- Trump Calls for Violent Street Demonstrations Against Himself
- Trump Changes Name of Republican Party
- The 2024 Election By the Numbers
- Bashar al-Assad—The Fall of a Rabid AntiSemite
Comments